Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papulankutja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Incubate. Consensus suggests the current contents aren't acceptable as a focus on this particualr organization, but that the content will be useful for a generalized article on Papulankutja Aboriginal artists. I will move this to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Papulankutja Aboriginal artists and do my best to trim some of the obvious problems. — Scientizzle 19:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Papulankutja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn corp, declined speedy. delete UtherSRG (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep WP:NTMP, [1] [2], [3], [4][5]Qwerty8ytrewq (talk) 13:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NTMP? That doesn't exist. I'll leave it for others to determine if the sources are or are not WP:V and WP:RS to show notability for WP:CORP. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources provided do not seem to establish notability, even when they mention the subject at all - several seem to be just database entries of some kind. Rehevkor ✉
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but move to Papulankutja Aboriginal artists or some similar generic title about the Aboriginal artists in the region, as sources verify that as a topic. The co-operative can be mentioned in it (unless more sources are provided that specifically address or highlight the co-operative itself). Ty 23:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:V WP:RS notability-> WP:CORP [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], I agree with proposed move to Papulankutja Aboriginal artists Qwerty8ytrewq (talk) 14:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also concur with the idea of creating an article about indigenous artists in the region, the content in this article could be used as a core to build that article around. As a standalone entity I'm not convinced of the cooperative's notability though. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Incubate in order to allow rebuilding as an article about artists rather than the location. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.